Legal Opinion

State v. Dexter

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1949No. 30642PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Respondent Avery Dexter and Hazel Dexter, his wife, had since September, 1945, held title in fee simple to three hundred twenty acres of marketable second-growth timber in Pend Oreille county. Beginning in November, 1945, and continuing into 1946, Dexter cut approximately one hundred fifty thousand board feet, log measure, of fir, larch, and white pine on that property; from November, 1945, until a restraining order issued in this action in •October, 1947, he cut hemlock suitable for pulpwood.

In 1947, the state forester became aware that the respondent was cutting and removing timber, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Shea v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. LaitinenWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Maple Leaf Investors, Inc. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Frach v. SchoettlerWashington Supreme Court · 1955

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API