Legal Opinion

Sequim Bay Canning Co. v. Bugge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1908No. 6940PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clallam county. Still, J., entered May 20, 1907, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to enjoin a trespass upon tide lands leased from the state.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

This is an action to enjoin the defendants from continuing what is alleged to be a trespass upon tide lands held by the plaintiff under leases of the state of Washington, the alleged trespass being for the purpose of digging and removing clams from the land. As the cause was determined in the trial court upon a demurrer to the complaint, the averments of the latter must, therefore, for the purposes of this appeal, be considered as the facts in the case. Such facts are as follows: The tide lands were leased from the state by George Davis, James Dick, and Frank Fisher. The purpose of leasing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Eisenbach v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ferry v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Bowlby v. ShivelyOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LongshoreWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. LongshoreWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Caminiti v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Gorham v. Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  5. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API