Legal Opinion

Washington State Major League Baseball Stadium Public Facilities District v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Construction Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2013No. 86210-9PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 This action arises out of a contract for construction of a baseball stadium and home field for the Seattle Mariners baseball team. It is the second time the case has been before us. In Washington State Major League Baseball Stadium Public Facilities District v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Construction Company, 165 Wn.2d 679, 202 P.3d 924 (2009) (PFD I), we held that the statute of limitations did not bar the owner’s suit against the general contractor because the action was brought for the benefit of the State, and therefore the exemption from the statute of limitations set out in RCW…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Adler v. Fred Lind ManorWashington Supreme Court · 2004

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Viking Bank v. Firgrove Commons 3, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. 4518 S. 256th, LLC v. Karen L. Gibbon, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Deggs v. Asbestos Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In The Matter Of: Linda Cameron, App v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Aka, RespCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Brinkley v. Monterey Fin. Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 4th District2015

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API