Packet Co. v. Sickles
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
72 U.S. 580 (____)
5 Wall. 580
PACKET COMPANY
v.
SICKLES.
Supreme Court of United States.
Messrs. Carlisle and Davidge, for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. Bradley, contra.
2Opinion of the Court · NelsonJustice Nelson
When this case, or one of the class, was formerly before this court,[] in which the record of the former recovery was in evidence, it was claimed that, without any extrinsic evidence, it concluded the defendants from again denying the existence of the contract, or from disproving any other of the averments in the first count of the declaration, and it had been so ruled by the court below.
This court, when the case came up on error,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Wood v. Jackson ex dem. GenetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
- Broadwell v. GetmanNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Lawrence v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1833
4Cited by151 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Yeager v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- New Orleans v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.