Legal Opinion

Run The World Inc. v. Jiang

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 28, 2025No. 4:23-cv-03130Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RUN THE WORLD INC., Case No. 23-cv-03130-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING FORMER 9 v. COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES 10 XUAN JIANG, Re: Dkt. Nos. 122, 124 Defendant. 11 12 13 Former Counterclaim Defendants Run The World, Inc. (“RTW”), and Xiaoyin Qu 14 (together “Counterclaim Defendants”) both filed Motions for Attorney’s Fees related to their 15 respective special motions to strike pursuant to California’s Anti-SLAPP statute. The Motions for 16 Attorney’s Fees were heard before this Court on March…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Dove Audio, Inc. v. Rosenfeld, Meyer & SusmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API