Kinney v. Cook
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*839¶1 — Clark E. Kinney and Barbara E. Kinney, a/k/a Bobbi Kinney, made a payment on a promissory note they had signed seven years earlier. The note was secured with stock in a business owned by the parties to the note. The Kinneys claim the holder of the note, Kenneth B. Cook, wrongfully induced their payment and that this was a violation of The Securities Act of Washington (Act), chapter 21.20 RCW. We conclude under the particular facts of this case that the payment on the note was not a sale, offer to sell, or disposition of a security, and therefore the Act does not apply. We reverse the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Trujillo v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.