Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Cook

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2007No. 78128-1PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*839¶1 — Clark E. Kinney and Barbara E. Kinney, a/k/a Bobbi Kinney, made a payment on a promissory note they had signed seven years earlier. The note was secured with stock in a business owned by the parties to the note. The Kinneys claim the holder of the note, Kenneth B. Cook, wrongfully induced their payment and that this was a violation of The Securities Act of Washington (Act), chapter 21.20 RCW. We conclude under the particular facts of this case that the payment on the note was not a sale, offer to sell, or disposition of a security, and therefore the Act does not apply. We reverse the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Trujillo v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API