Legal Opinion

Kitze v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 24, 1996No. 1900942PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDER, Judge.

Jeffrey Theodore Kitze (appellant) appeals his convictions for rape, in violation of Code § 18.2-61, and malicious wounding, in violation of Code § 18.2-51. As part of appellant’s sentence, appellant was requested to register with local law enforcement officers as a sex offender pursuant to Code § 19.2-298.1. Appellant contends that because Code § 19.2-298.1 was enacted after the offenses occurred, the trial court violated his federal and state constitutional rights against the imposition of an ex post facto law. We disagree with appellant and affirm his convictions.

I

FACTS

Followin…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Russell v. GregoireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. State v. BolligWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. CastellanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API