Legal Opinion

United States v. Diana Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 13, 2000No. 99-10485PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Diana Johnson was found guilty by a jury of receiving “stolen Government property,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, by receiving money embezzled from the Agricultural Stabilization Conservation Service (“ASCS”), 1 a branch of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). The question before us today is whether the evidence before the jury was sufficient to support a finding that the money received by Johnson was property of 2 the United States Government. We hold that it was. We therefore vacate the district court’s judgment of acquittal and reinstate the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Wright v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. CroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Quentin Hinton, AKA Ronnie BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. John U. FoumaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Donald Douglas Franklin, Jr., United States of America v. William Edward PiersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API