United States v. Rosales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GUILFORD, District Judge:
BACKGROUND
This appeal and cross-appeal arise from the conviction of Jaime Flores Rosales (“Rosales”) for three drug offenses. After a long jury trial lasting most of June 2004, Rosales was convicted on one count of conspiring to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine (Count 1), and two counts of possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute (Counts 5 and 6). In the same trial, the jury found that another defendant, co-conspirator Alfonso Allan Brooks (“Brooks”), was guilty of many drug offenses, after his lawyer conceded liability on three of those crimes. See…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- House v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wright v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. HellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Ramon Hueso v. J.A. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. CroweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. MacIel-alcalaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.