Legal Opinion
United States v. Croft
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 5, 1997No. Nos. 95-30378, 95-30397PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Sally-Anne Croft and Susan Hagan were convicted by a jury of conspiring to murder the United States Attorney for the District of Oregon, a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1111, 1114, and 1117. Croft and Hagan now appeal their convictions, arguing on a variety of grounds that they were denied a fair trial and a full opportunity to confront the witnesses against them. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the convictions.
BACKGROUND
Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh (“Rajneesh”) was an Indian mystic who developed a substantial following in Poona, India in the 1970s.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Anton E. Barker v. Gary FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Runningeagle v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Lewis Tam, AKA Yiu Kwong Tam, United States of America v. Robert Ng, United States of America v. Co GiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Thongsangoune SayakhomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.