Legal Opinion

Bemis Bro. Bag v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 6, 1922No. 2137PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartiN, Judge

The importations now before the court consist of certain woven fabrics composed of single jute yarns, and the sole issue in the present case is whether they are colored or not colored, within contemplation of the tariff act of 1913.

There are two paragraphs of the act which severally relate to merchandise of this character, to wit, paragraph 279, which imposes duty upon such goods if colored, and paragraph 408, which grants them free entry if not colored. These goods were classified and assessed with duty by the collector under paragraph 279, which assessment was protested by the importers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Bryant & BeineckeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. Heyliger v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Balfour v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Nahrgang v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API