Legal Opinion

Haenchen v. Sand Products Co., Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 26, 1981No. 52862PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYDSTON, Judge.

This is an appeal by Fred Haenchen from the trial court’s decision to sustain a demurrer at the close of his case-in-chief. The case was a nuisance action brought to recover damages to farm land and to abate flooding allegedly caused by adjacent landowner’s earthen dam. The trial judge gave three reasons for sustaining the demurrer:

1. the action was barred by the statute of limitations;

2. the plaintiff not only failed to prove that the defendant created an embankment by virtue of his sand operation, but also failed to prove that the embankment was the proximate cause of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Condo v. BealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Murduck v. City of BlackwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  5. Elk City v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Smicklas v. SpitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. N.C. Corff Partnership, Ltd. v. OXY USA, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Clayton Peterson v. Raymond Hager, D/B/A Hager's Flying ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  5. Moneypenney v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API