Legal Opinion
Rippley v. City of Lincoln
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1983No. Civ. 10181PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by the plaintiffs (the Rippleys) from a judgment of the District Court of Burleigh County, dated January 12, 1982, dismissing on its merits the Ripp-leys’ inverse condemnation action against the defendants (Lincoln). Lincoln has filed a cross-appeal from the district court’s .denial of its request for attorney’s fees. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The Rippleys currently own approximately 20 acres of land within the City of Lincoln. Prior to the establishment of the City of Lincoln, the Rippleys’ land was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Morris County Land Improvement Co. v. Township of Parsippany-Troy HillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schwartz v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Wild Rice River Estates, Inc. v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Grand Forks-Traill Water Users, Inc. v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Corrigan v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.