Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. City of Scottsdale
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1986No. 18239-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
This is a petition for review of an opinion of the court of appeals, which reversed the trial court judgment in favor of the City of Scottsdale and declared its zoning ordinance void as an unconstitutional taking of Ms. Corrigan’s property without just compensation. Corrigan v. City of Scottsdale, 149 Ariz. 553, 720 P.2d 528 [App.1985]. We have jurisdiction pursuant to art. 6 § 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Rule 23, Ariz.R.Civ.App. Proc., 17A A.R.S.
The only issue to be decided on review is whether a landowner is entitled to money damages for a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Culebra Enterprises Corp. v. Estado Libre AsociadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1997
- RANCH 57 v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Poirier v. Grand Blanc TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Third & Catalina Associates v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- St. Lucas Ass'n v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.