Legal Opinion
In Re Peter S. Mills
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 9, 1990No. 90-1184PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the November 2, 1989, decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), Appeal No. 88-0141, affirming the examiner’s rejection, under 35 U.S.C. § 103, of claims 6-9 and 11-14 in Mills’ application Serial No. 891,374, a continuation of Serial No. 607-805, filed May 4, 1984, entitled “Methods of and Apparatus for Producing Aerated Cementitious Compounds." The remainder of the claims (1-5, 10, and 15) have all been cancelled. We reverse.
I
BACKGROUND
A.The Invention
Mills’ claimed invention is an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In Re Lucas S. Gordon and Karl M. SutherlandCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In re LudtkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re CarletonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin GmbHDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1994
- North American Oil Co. v. Star Brite Distributing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- In Re Hans OetikerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- In Re Hans OetikerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.