Legal Opinion

In Re Hans Oetiker

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 13, 1992No. 91-1026Published

1Opinion of the Court

977 F.2d 1443

24 U.S.P.Q.2d 1443

In re Hans OETIKER.

No. 91-1026.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

Oct. 13, 1992.

Paul M. Craig, Jr., Washington, D.C., argued for appellant.

John W. Dewhirst, Office of the Sol., Arlington, Va., argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Fred E. McKelvey, Sol. and Robert D. Edmonds, Associate Sol.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and PLAGER, Circuit Judges.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

1

Hans Oetiker appeals the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, holding unpatentable claims 1-14 and…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Nies; Concurrence · Plager.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Interconnect Planning Corporation v. Thomas E. Feil, Robert O. Carpenter, v Band Systems, Inc., and Turret Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API