State v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendant first assigns error to the court’s overruling his objection to the district attorney’s question directed to the State’s witness, James Stewart, as to whether it was Stewart’s “usual practice to go about locking the house” before going to bed. Defendant contends this was error because the witness had just previously testified that he had no recollection concerning locking his house before going to bed on the night of 24 May 1978. Defendant argues that in view of this testimony, whatever Stewart’s “usual practice” may have been, it could not have been relevant in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. PenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MyrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. FaulknerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- State v. FeyereisenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.