Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1972No. 7218SC204PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error that the trial judge instructed the jury that it should return a verdict of guilty on the first count in the bill of indictment if it was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant broke or entered the premises. It is defendant’s argument that this instruction is error because the bill of indictment charges that defendant broke and entered, and therefore the State has the burden of proving both breaking and entering.

It seems that the public defender is seeking to resurrect an argument which was laid to rest in State v. Jones, 272 N.C. 108, 157…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API