Legal Opinion

State v. Myrick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1982No. 68A81PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the state’s evidence to support his conviction of felonious breaking and the adequacy of the trial court’s instructions to the jury. We conclude that the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss for evidentiary insufficiency and that the jury was adequately instructed.

The state’s evidence at trial tended to show the following:

Arthur Glidden managed the Ocean Islands Gas and Grill, Inc. in Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina. On 6 March 1979 defend ant was helping Glidden lock up the store at 10 p.m. Although defendant was not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. JollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. NolandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. United States v. Glynn BowdenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  5. In Re BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API