Legal Opinion

Rankin-Thoman, Inc. v. Caldwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1975No. Nos. 74-441 and 74-471PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Beown, J.

In Zangerle v. Evatt (1942), 139 Ohio St. 563, Fortner v. Thomas (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 13, M. J. Kelley Co. v. Cleveland (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 150, Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control Comm. (1973), 34 Ohio St. 2d 93, and DeLong v. Board of Edn. (1973), *43836 Ohio St. 2d 62, this court held that the review of proceeding’s of administrative officers and agencies, authorized by Section 4(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, contemplates quasi-judicial proceedings only. In Fortner, supra, and Burger Brewing Co., supra, we declared that R. C. 119.11 could not be employed' to obtain judicial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Zangerle v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. DeLong v. Board of Education of Southwest School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tradesmen International, Incor v. John BlackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Rossford Exempted Village School District v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Union Title Co. v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nielsen v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Union Camp Corp. v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API