Legal Opinion

Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLC

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 28, 2010No. A08-1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.

This appeal involves a foreclosure priority dispute between a mortgagee and two mechanic’s lien holders in the context of Torrens property. The arguments of the parties center on when a mortgage is “of record” under Minn.Stat. § 514.05 (2008), an issue of first impression in Minnesota. That statute requires a mortgage to have been “of record” at the time a mechanic’s lien attaches in order to have superior priority to the lien. Respondent lien-holders contend that “of record” means that a mortgage against Torrens property has been both filed and memorialized…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. ITT Life Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Reuben E. Johnson Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. MidCountry Bank v. KruegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Suburban Exteriors, Inc. v. Emerald Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re the Welfare of R.S.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. In re Individual 35W Bridge LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Somsen, Mueller, Lowther & Franta, PA v. Estates of OlsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Salcedo v. UeckerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API