MidCountry Bank v. Krueger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
At issue in this appeal is whether a mortgage was “properly recorded” under Minn.Stat. § 507.32 (2008), thereby giving constructive notice to a subsequent purchaser of land and a mortgagee.
Respondent MidCountry Bank brought an action in district court to foreclose a mortgage on property owned by appellant Cherolyn Hinshaw (the “Hinshaw property”). 1 Appellant PHH Home Loans also held a mortgage against the Hinshaw property. MidCountry argued that its mortgage on the property was properly recorded by the Scott County Recorder’s Office prior to the recording…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Miller v. HennenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Bailey v. GalpinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Finnegan v. SunTrust MortgageDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Bilden Properties, LLC v. BirinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.