Legal Opinion

MidCountry Bank v. Krueger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 2010No. A08-534PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.

At issue in this appeal is whether a mortgage was “properly recorded” under Minn.Stat. § 507.32 (2008), thereby giving constructive notice to a subsequent purchaser of land and a mortgagee.

Respondent MidCountry Bank brought an action in district court to foreclose a mortgage on property owned by appellant Cherolyn Hinshaw (the “Hinshaw property”). 1 Appellant PHH Home Loans also held a mortgage against the Hinshaw property. MidCountry argued that its mortgage on the property was properly recorded by the Scott County Recorder’s Office prior to the recording…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Miller v. HennenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Metropolitan Airports Commission v. NobleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. Bailey v. GalpinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Finnegan v. SunTrust MortgageDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  3. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
  4. Bilden Properties, LLC v. BirinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  5. Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Calhoun Development, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API