Van Winkle v. NEW JERSEY DOC

850 A.2d 548 (2004)

370 N.J. Super. 40

Charles P. VAN WINKLE, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 3, 2004.

Decided June 16, 2004.

Jeffrey E. Fogel, argued the cause for appellant.

Tamara L. Rudow, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter C. Harvey, Attorney General, attorney; Patrick DeAlmeida, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Ms. Rudow, on the brief).

Before Judges NEWMAN, PARRILLO and HOENS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

NEWMAN, J.A.D.

Petitioner Charles Van Winkle…