Legal Opinion
State v. Buhl
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 3, 1994PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
269 N.J. Super. 344 (1994)
635 A.2d 562
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
LEROY BUHL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted November 29, 1993.
Decided January 3, 1994.
Before Judges PETRELLA, BAIME and CONLEY.
Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for appellant (Mark S. Carter, designated attorney, of counsel and on the letter-brief).
Appellant submitted a pro se supplemental letter-brief.
Fred DeVesa, Acting Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Marcy H. Geraci, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the letter-brief).
The opinion of…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Leroy Buhl v. Mr. Cooksey, Warden Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- State v. GoodmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- State v. GallagherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- State v. LivernoisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MillettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.