Legal Opinion

Colorado National Bank-Boulder v. Zerobnick & Sander, P.C.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1989No. 86CA0554PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Judge.

Intervenor, Colorado National Bank-Boulder (Bank), appeals the trial court’s determination that an attorney’s lien under § 12-5-119, C.R.S., has priority over its perfected security interest. Zerobnick & Sander, P.C. (Zerobnick), cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of an increase in the lien for services prior to judgment and an attorney’s lien for post-judgment services. We reverse as to the principal appeal and affirm as to the cross-appeal.

Zerobnick represented Colorado Western Manufacturing, Inc., in an action to recover certain stirrup molds from one Stadler. Bank…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loomis v. SeelyColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Laessig v. May D & F & American Credit Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. Effective Communications West, Inc. v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scognamillo v. OlsenColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Flagstaff Enterprises Construction, Inc. v. SnowColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. McCall v. MeyersColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Fleet v. ZwickColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. McNaughton & Rodgers v. BesserColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API