Colorado National Bank-Boulder v. Zerobnick & Sander, P.C.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Intervenor, Colorado National Bank-Boulder (Bank), appeals the trial court’s determination that an attorney’s lien under § 12-5-119, C.R.S., has priority over its perfected security interest. Zerobnick & Sander, P.C. (Zerobnick), cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of an increase in the lien for services prior to judgment and an attorney’s lien for post-judgment services. We reverse as to the principal appeal and affirm as to the cross-appeal.
Zerobnick represented Colorado Western Manufacturing, Inc., in an action to recover certain stirrup molds from one Stadler. Bank…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Loomis v. SeelyColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Laessig v. May D & F & American Credit Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Effective Communications West, Inc. v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scognamillo v. OlsenColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Flagstaff Enterprises Construction, Inc. v. SnowColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- McCall v. MeyersColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Fleet v. ZwickColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- McNaughton & Rodgers v. BesserColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.