Legal Opinion

Scognamillo v. Olsen

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1990No. 87CA1489PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge SMITH.

In this legal malpractice action, defendants, attorney Robert E. Olsen (Olsen) individually, and the law firm of Olsen and Guardi, appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding plaintiff Peter Scognamillo, $200,187.49, and plaintiff Harry Faircloth, $615,052.40. Both plaintiffs cross-appeal a reduction in their judgments based on a finding of comparative negligence and the court’s order reducing each verdict by $27,000. Plaintiff Faircloth also cross-appeals the trial court’s order denying him prejudgment interest. We affirm.

The judgment at issue here arose…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. KN Energy, Inc. v. Great Western Sugar Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  3. McGlasson v. BargerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Hunt v. DresieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Valley Development Co. v. WeeksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Tri-G, Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Roberts v. Holland & HartColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Haberer v. RiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Jacobsen v. OliverDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API