Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court (Preciado)

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 2001No. D036024PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENKE, J.

In this case we find that although a petition alleging that a person is a sexually violent predator (SVP) within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA or Act) (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) 1 should not be filed until two psychotherapists have evaluated the alleged SVP and found that his condition meets the requirements of the Act, a failure to do so may be cured by the People after the petition is filed. Thus, in this case, where the People’s petition was timely and the required evaluations were performed prior to the end of the alleged SVP’s previous…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In Re ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. Superior Court (Myers)California Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Butler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. Superior Court (Ghilotti)California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. YartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In Re RonjeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API