Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1934No. 6226PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

T. A. Dawson brought this suit against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act for damages for injuries received while employed by the Railway Company as a switchman in its yards at Longview. He alleged that his injuries were caused by a handhold or “grab-iron” on one of the Company’s box cars giving way and causing him to fall from near the top of said car. In answer to proper questions, the jury found the following facts: Dawson’s injuries were caused by a broken handhold, as alleged; the defendant was guilty of negligence in using a car with a broken…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. BorumSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Lupher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Hart v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Huffman v. Southern UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Swanson v. American Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Long v. Big Horn Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  5. White v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API