Legal Opinion

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad v. Borum

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 23, 1932No. 585PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

In October, 1921, petitioner accepted respondent’s application for work as a switchman, and the latter in December, 1928, was injured while employed in interstate transportation. He brought this action in the district court of Hennepin county to recover damages under the Federal Employers Liability Act (45 U. S. C., §§ 51-59) and, .after issue was joined, the parties made an agreement for arbitration under a statute of Minnesota (G. S. 1923, §§ 9513-9519) pursuant to which the company paid plaintiff $12,500 to be retained by him in any event. And it was agreed %at, if the arbitrators found…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Borum v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Harkrider v. PoseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Cross v. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Claim of Sackolwitz v. Charles Hamburg & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Matthews v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API