Legal Opinion

Chernow v. Chernow

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1954No. Civ. 20228PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendant from that part of an interlocutory judgment of divorce which orders him to pay plaintiff’s attorney’s fees.

The complaint, filed October 1, 1952, did not allege that plaintiff had been a resident of the state one year and of the county of Los Angeles three months next preceding the commencement of the action. (Civ. Code, § 128.) On October 22, 1952, on the hearing of an order to show cause, defendant was ordered to pay $1,000 on account of attorney’s fees to plaintiff’s attorneys, the balance, if any, to be fixed at the time of trial. The cause went to trial on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. White v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Kelsey v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Haldane v. HaldaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. In Re Marriage of HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Handy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. OfRoxie v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API