Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Commission
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Metropolitan Property and Casualty Corporation (Metropolitan). MTC argues that the district court erred: (1) by determining that Metropolitan’s indemnification claim was timely since there is no statute of limitations on indemnification rights under the Minnesota no-fault act, and (2) by determining that even if the statute of limitations is six years under Minn.Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1 (1992), Metropolitan’s claim was still timely. We conclude the district court erred in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- City of Virginia v. Northland Office Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- MILBANK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. KluverSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Farm v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004