Legal Opinion

Clark v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 20, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilbrook, J.

This is an action at law, in assumpsit, to recover the amount due under the terms of an insurance policy issued by the defendant, and in which the plaintiff, now widow of the insured, was named as the beneficiary. After a jury waived hearing, by consent of the parties, the presiding justice reported the case to the law court for final determination.

The policy was written with express right of the insured to change the beneficiary, and to designate a new one “by filing written notice thereof at the home office of the company, accompanied by the policy for suitable indorsement. Such change…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wandell v. Mystic ToilersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. French v. Provident Savings Life Assurance Society of New YorkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Knott v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Haydel v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1899
  5. Franklin Motor Car Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of Althenn v. AlthennSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. LaMarche v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002
  3. Lovett v. Phoenix Mut. Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1942
  4. Krajewski v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
  5. United Benefit Life Ins. v. ElliottDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API