Legal Opinion

Lovett v. Phoenix Mut. Life Insurance

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided May 6, 1942No. Civil Action No. 117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTIGAN, District Judge.

This is a civil action wherein the plaintiffs pray for the reformation of a certain insurance policy and the recovery of certain alleged total and permanent disability benefits under said reformed policy and was tried upon the facts without a jury.

The plaintiffs are James H. Lovett, the insured, and Anna M. Lovett, his wife and the beneficiary named in said policy, both of whom are citizens of the State of Rhode Island. The defendant is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Connecticut and is authorized by the laws of Rhode Island to do insurance…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. DunkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Lipman v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  4. McCormick v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Pequot Manufacturing Corp. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. KaiserMississippi Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Gerber v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Macartney v. ParmenterDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1952
  4. Gerber v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API