Legal Opinion

Gray v. Kagan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 15, 1958No. Eq. Nos. 2615, 2616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

These are two petitions by an employee which were brought under the workmen’s compensation act. The first case is an original petition which was changed to a petition to amend and the other case is a petition to review. They were heard together before a single commissioner and two decisions were filed. Separate decrees, prepared by the respondents’ counsel, were entered denying the first petition in toto and granting the second petition only to the extent of awarding the petitioner compensation for total incapacity for two weeks. The petitioner appealed both cases to the full commission,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Imperial Knife Co. v. GonsalvesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
  2. Trotta v. BROWN & SHARPE MANUFACTURING COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1957
  3. Frenier v. United Wire & Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1956
  4. Enos v. ABRASIVE MACHINE TOOL COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gray v. KaganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
  2. Fontaine v. GorfineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Boudreau v. RJ Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  4. Broadbent v. Providence Gas Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
  5. Taylor v. Artie's Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API