Legal Opinion

Dynes Corp. v. Seikel, Koly & Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1994No. Nos. 66171, 66632 and 66776PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Krupansky, Judge.

In this consolidated appeal, plaintiffs-appellants Dynes Corporation (“Dynes Corporation”), Dynes Village Associates Limited Partnership (“Dynes Partnership”) and Dolores and Robert Thompson (“the Thompsons”) timely appeal from five orders of the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court, which follow:(1) three August 23, 1993 summary judgment grants to

(A) defendants-appellees Seikel, Koly & Co., Inc. (“SKC”) and John Seikel (“Seikel”);

(B) defendants-appellees NTCP, viz., National Tax Credit Partners, L.P. (“National Partnership”) and NTC, viz., National Tax Credit, Inc. (“National…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. OgleDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
  2. Gehret v. Rismiller, 06ca1705 (4-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Pinney Dock & Transport Co. v. Penn Central Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  4. Antero Resources Corporation v. Tejas Tubular Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  5. Davis v. MeyersOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API