Legal Opinion

Gage v. Dunning

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1923No. File No. 5197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.

The question before us is whether certain items of disbursements may be taxed against an unsuccessful plaintiff in a garnishment proceeding. The trial court held that they could not be taxed, and the garnishee defendant, the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, appeals.

Prior to the garnishment the railway company had issued its bill of lading to defendant Dunning for the shipment of certain household goods. Upon the service of the garnishee summons *554the railway unloaded the goods, stored them, and, upon the determination of the issue unfavorably to the garnishor, the railroad company…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Macomb v. Lake CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Redfield v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Eggen v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carlson v. City of FaithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Eggen v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Buckingham Trans. v. B.H. Trans.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API