Legal Opinion

Buckingham Trans. v. B.H. Trans.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1939No. File No. 8181Published

1Opinion of the Court

The South Dakota Railroad Commission entered its order requiring the Buckingham Transportation Company to desist from transporting to other South Dakota points certain goods transported from without the state to Rapid City by rail in a pool car. Appeal to the circuit court, and from an affirming judgment of the circuit court to this court, pursuant to Chapter 204, Laws of 1937, resulted in a reversal and a direction to dismiss the complaint. Buckingham Transportation Company of Colorado, Inc., v. Black Hills Transportation Company et al.,66 S.D. 230, 281 N.W. 94.

In accordance with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kirby v. Circuit CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Elfring v. New Birdsall Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Macomb v. Lake CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Redfield v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Wold v. South Dakota Central Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API