Legal Opinion

Macomb v. Lake County

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Lake county. Hon. J. W. Jones, Judge. Injunction by William Stanton Macomb against Lake county and others to restrain the selling of property for taxes. Judgment for plaintiff. From an order refusing plaintiff costs in addition to actual disbursements, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff, who was the owner of one share of the capital stock of the Northwestern Loan & Banking Company, to restrain the defendant, the” treasurer of Lake county, from selling the same for the payment of a tax levied thereon by the city of Madison for the year 1892. The findings and judgment were in favor of the plaintiff; requiring the treasurer to accept the amount tendered, and restraining him from selling the said stock. The court in its fourth conclusion of law, states “that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover costs against the defendants, or either of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Riper v. PoppenhausenNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Herrington v. . RobertsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Pyle v. Hand CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Pratt v. RamsdellNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Northwestern Loan & Banking Co. v. MuggliSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Martindale v. DickeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Gage v. DunningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Williamson v. Lake CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Buckingham Trans. v. B.H. Trans.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Heiser v. RodwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API