People v. Blaay
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Kent; Perkins, J. John De Blaay was convicted of hawking and peddling without a license.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The respondent was convicted of the offense of hawking and peddling without a license, the charge being based upon chapter 136, 2 Comp. Laws.
Two major contentions are made by respondent’s counsel in this court: First, that the statute under which the prosecution was had has been repealed; and, second, that, if not repealed, it is unconstitutional. Obviously, if the first contention is sustained, the second is unimportant. We therefore direct our first attention to this point.
Act No. 204, Pub. Acts 1889, was an act which, under a title restricting its operation to the Upper Peninsula, made…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sweet v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Allison v. CorkerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Ferry v. CampbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- John Spry Lumber Co. v. Sault Savings Bank Loan & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Rosenbloom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. KevorkianMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Mazurek v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- State v. Silver Bow Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
- Lawton Spinning Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Briggs v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.