Legal Opinion

State v. Silver Bow Refining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1926No. 6,046PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The state commenced action against the Silver Bow Refining Company for the recovery of amounts alleged to be due as delinquent license taxes for the second and third quarters of the year 1925. The defendant interposed a demurrer to the complaint filed, which is both general and special. This demurrer was sustained in its entirety, and, the state refusing to amend, judgment was entered in favor of defendant. From this judgment the state has appealed specifying error upon the action of the court in sustaining the demurrer and in entering judgment.

The complaint states two causes of action which…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Ware v. HyltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1796
  5. Sonneborn Brothers v. CuretonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Leonardson v. MoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hart Refineries v. HarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. State Ex Rel. VassarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Cottingham v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sheridan County Electric Co-Op., Inc. v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API