Legal Opinion
Buckley v. Meis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2003No. 03-35003; D.C. No. CV-02-02051-TSZPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Pro se plaintiff-appellant Richard Buckley appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). On appeal, Buckley argues that his claims should not have been dismissed because: 1) it is possible to raise § 1983 claims against the federal government; 2) he substantially complied with the presentment requirements of Title VII; and 3) the Civil Service Reform Act (“CSRA”) does not prevent him from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jeffrey A. Saul v. United States of America Ray Larsen Colleen St. Louis John Doe St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Shelley Sommatino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Kirtley v. RaineyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Buckley v. Meis, Regional Chief Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Seattle Region X, Social Security AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 2004