Legal Opinion
Shelley Sommatino v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2001No. 99-16797PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge LEAVY; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
LEAVY, Circuit Judge:
Shelley Sommatino (“Sommatino”) appeals the district court’s dismissal, with prejudice of her action in which ghe asserted claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. The district court concluded that Sommatino did not state a claim under the FTCA and that the court had no jurisdiction to consider her Title VII claims because Sommatino did not file an administrative complaint. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Aybike Kortan v. California Youth Authority Albert Atesalp I.R. Schulman Manual CarbajalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Farmer Brothers Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Diana Estrada, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- Jimmy Leong v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Do Sung Uhm v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Kildare v. SaenzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Papa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.