Legal Opinion
Paddack v. Furtick
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 26, 1986No. A8302-01113; CA A33316PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Plaintiffs, trustees of various labor-management trust funds, brought this action under section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 USC § 185(a) to recover allegedly unpaid employe benefit contributions, as well as liquidated damages, interest and attorney fees. Judgment was entered for defendants, and the sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in awarding them $37,665.75 for attorney fees.
Defendants contended below that they were entitled to recover attorney fees under ORS 20.096(1), 1 Oregon’s reciprocal attorney fees statute. 2 On appeal, however, they…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Northwest Excavating, Inc. v. WaggonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Vermeer v. BunyardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- Herinckx v. SanelleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Hanson v. Signer Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Warehouse, Processing, Distribution Workers Union v. Hugo Neu Proler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Abbott v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Hannan v. R. Concrete, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.