Legal Opinion

Cent. Motors Corp. v. Pepper Pike

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1995No. 1994-0375PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 581.] CENTRAL MOTORS CORPORATION, APPELLEE v. CITY OF PEPPER PIKE ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Cent. Motors Corp. v. Pepper Pike,

1995-Ohio-289.] Zoning—Pepper Pike zoning ordinance No. 1981-21 permitting townhouse units at a maximum density of 2.5 units per acre constitutional. (No. 94-375—Submitted May 23, 1995—Decided September 6, 1995.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 64422. __________________ {¶ 1} The twenty-one-year-old case before us concerns the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sunset Estate Properties, L.L.C. v. Village of LodiOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Goldberg Cos., Inc. v. Richmond Hts. City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. West Chester Twp. Bd. v. Speedway Superamerica, Ca2006-05-104 (6-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API