Legal Opinion

Yaeger v. Southern California Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1897No. L. A. No. 240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Orange County; J. W. Towner, Judge. Action by Jacob Yaeger against the Southern California Railway Company for damages for personal injuries. Verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appeals from order denying motion for new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action for damages alleged to have resulted from a collision on defendant’s railroad at the station of Orange. The cause was tried by a jury, and defendant had the verdict. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying motion for a new trial, and on a statement of the case. The complaint alleges that, while plaintiff was a passenger on the car of defendant, a collision occurred at said station, ‘ ‘ caused by the negligence of the defendant and its servants; that plaintiff was, through the shock of said collision, thrown against a partition and seat in said car with great force and…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Colton Land & Water Co. v. SwartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Stoddard v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Sturgis v. KountzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Williams v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cordiner v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API