Legal Opinion

Cordiner v. Los Angeles Traction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1907No. Civ. No. 336PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, denying motions for a new trial. Curtis D. Wilbur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSitaw, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while lawfully riding on a street-car operated by the Los Angeles Traction Company, one of the defendants.

The Los Angeles Traction Company owned a street-car line on Sixteenth street, in Los Angeles, over which it was running its cars in carrying passengers; the Los Angeles Railway Company owned and operated a street-car line on Grand avenue, in said city.

On January 31, 1903, a collision occurred at the intersection of West Sixteenth street and South Grand avenue between the car of the Los Angeles Traction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Block v. Milwaukee Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Strohm v. . the N.Y., L.E. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Pastene v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Husky Refining Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. Spear v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API