Legal Opinion
Hartkopf v. Heinrich Ad. Berkemann
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 27, 1991No. A91A0372, A91A0373PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Chief Judge.
Heinrich Ad. Berkemann (GMBH & Co.), a German corporation (hereinafter “HAB”), brought suit against Hermes Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter “HEI”), Erika Hartkopf, and Heinz Hartkopf to recover amounts due under a series of ten promissory notes and an open account. Consent judgment was entered against HEI. HAB then moved for summary judgment against the individual defendants, and the trial court granted partial summary judgment against Erika Hartkopf on seven of the promissory notes on the ground that she had executed the notes in her individual capacity. In Case No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. HyzerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Bostwick Banking Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- American Investment Co. v. Cable Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Southern Oxygen Supply Company v. De GolianSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Boss v. Food Giant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marek Interior Systems, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Groth v. Ace Cash Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- American Management Corp. v. DunlapDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1992
- Griffin v. Associated PayphoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Foster v. Homeward Residential Inc. ex rel. U.S. Bank National Ass'n (In re Foster)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.