Legal Opinion

Marek Interior Systems, Inc. v. White

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 30, 1998No. A97A1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Chief Judge.

Marek Interior Systems, Inc. (Marek) sued Summit Commercial Contractors, Inc. (Summit) and its principals, Roger White and Tom Wiedeman, to recover on a promissory note to which the parties agreed in January 1993. As Summit was defunct, it appears Marek’s chief claim was that White and Wiedeman were personally liable for the amounts due because they had signed the note in their individual capacities. White and Wiedeman claimed they signed the note on behalf of Summit alone, and the jury returned a verdict for the defendants. In this appeal, Marek contends it was entitled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Polito v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Carelli v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hamrick v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Yeomans v. Coleman, Meadows, Pate Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Hartkopf v. Heinrich Ad. BerkemannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Envision Printing, LLC v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. Stone v. Williams General Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Ansley v. AnsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Belcher v. BremerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Brown v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API