Legal Opinion

Hickman v. Hyzer

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1991No. S90G0993PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Chief Justice.

Peter and Bette Hyzer brought an action against Earl L. Hickman, seeking to hold him personally liable for the obligations of Mike Shean Signature Homes, Inc. (“the Corporation”). The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Hickman, holding that the undisputed facts demonstrated no abuse of the corporate form that would warrant piercing the corporate veil. The Court of Appeals reversed, saying that evidence of inadequate capitalization and preferential distributions created a genuine issue of fact as to whether the circumstances authorize piercing of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers Warehouse of Pelham, Inc. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Exchange Bank v. Macon Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Ware v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  4. Hyzer v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. 66, Inc. v. Crestwood Commons Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. Yukon Partners, Inc. v. Lodge Keeper Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Albee v. KrasnoffCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. R. W. Holdco, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Fuda v. KroenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API