Legal Opinion

Katz v. Manhattan General, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.

The original complaint in this action pleaded that defendant, which is a hospital, contracted with plaintiff ‘ ‘ diligently and skillfully to treat and care for plaintiff ’ ’ and ‘ ‘ to render her all necessary routine medical treatment and nursing services which her condition might require, through the hands of its agents, servants and employees both of a skilled and unskilled nature

It further pleaded that defendant failed to furnish plaintiff “ diligent and skillful care and treatment * * * thereby breaching its contract. ’ ’ The ‘ ‘ breach ’ ’ thus charged was by pleading that she “ was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Knowles v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Lifshutz v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Weinberger v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baum v. TurelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API