Katz v. Manhattan General, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBergan, J.
The original complaint in this action pleaded that defendant, which is a hospital, contracted with plaintiff ‘ ‘ diligently and skillfully to treat and care for plaintiff ’ ’ and ‘ ‘ to render her all necessary routine medical treatment and nursing services which her condition might require, through the hands of its agents, servants and employees both of a skilled and unskilled nature
It further pleaded that defendant failed to furnish plaintiff “ diligent and skillful care and treatment * * * thereby breaching its contract. ’ ’ The ‘ ‘ breach ’ ’ thus charged was by pleading that she “ was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gerdes v. ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Knowles v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Lifshutz v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Weinberger v. QuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baum v. TurelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962